What's the best way to implement Django + Celery for background tasks?
I'm working on a Django project and encountering an issue with Django admin. Here's my current implementation:
# models.py
class Article(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=200)
author = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
# This is causing issues
super().save(*args, **kwargs)
The specific error I'm getting is: "django.core.exceptions.ValidationError: Enter a valid email address"
I've already tried the following approaches:
- Checked Django documentation and Stack Overflow
- Verified my database schema and migrations
- Added debugging prints to trace the issue
- Tested with different data inputs
Environment details:
- Django version: 5.0.1
- Python version: 3.11.0
- Database: PostgreSQL 15
- Operating system: Windows 11
Has anyone encountered this before? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Comments
jane_smith: How would you modify this approach for a high-traffic production environment? 1 week, 4 days ago
abaditaye: Could you provide the requirements.txt for the packages used in this solution? 1 week, 4 days ago
3 Answers
The choice between Django signals and overriding save() depends on your use case:
Use save() method when:
- The logic is directly related to the model
- You need to modify the instance before saving
- The operation is essential for data integrity
class Article(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=200)
slug = models.SlugField(unique=True)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
if not self.slug:
self.slug = slugify(self.title)
super().save(*args, **kwargs)
Use signals when:
- You need decoupled logic
- Multiple models need the same behavior
- You're working with third-party models
from django.db.models.signals import post_save
from django.dispatch import receiver
@receiver(post_save, sender=User)
def create_user_profile(sender, instance, created, **kwargs):
if created:
UserProfile.objects.create(user=instance)
Comments
abadi: This Django transaction approach worked perfectly for my payment processing system. Thanks! 1 week, 4 days ago
jane_smith: This Django transaction approach worked perfectly for my payment processing system. Thanks! 1 week, 4 days ago
The RecursionError occurs when Python's recursion limit is exceeded. Here are several solutions:
1. Increase recursion limit (temporary fix):
import sys
sys.setrecursionlimit(10000) # Default is usually 1000
2. Convert to iterative approach (recommended):
# Recursive (problematic for large inputs)
def factorial_recursive(n):
if n <= 1:
return 1
return n * factorial_recursive(n - 1)
# Iterative (better)
def factorial_iterative(n):
result = 1
for i in range(2, n + 1):
result *= i
return result
3. Use memoization for recursive algorithms:
from functools import lru_cache
@lru_cache(maxsize=None)
def fibonacci(n):
if n < 2:
return n
return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)
4. Tail recursion optimization (manual):
def factorial_tail_recursive(n, accumulator=1):
if n <= 1:
return accumulator
return factorial_tail_recursive(n - 1, n * accumulator)
Comments
joseph: Excellent debugging strategy! The logging configuration is exactly what our team needed. 1 week, 4 days ago
abdullah3: Have you considered using Django's async views for this use case? Might be more efficient for I/O operations. 1 week, 4 days ago
Here's how to optimize Python code performance using profiling tools:
1. Use cProfile for function-level profiling:
import cProfile
import pstats
# Profile your code
cProfile.run('your_function()', 'profile_output.prof')
# Analyze results
stats = pstats.Stats('profile_output.prof')
stats.sort_stats('cumulative')
stats.print_stats(10) # Top 10 functions
2. Use line_profiler for line-by-line analysis:
# Install: pip install line_profiler
# Add @profile decorator to functions
@profile
def slow_function():
# Your code here
pass
# Run: kernprof -l -v script.py
3. Memory profiling with memory_profiler:
# Install: pip install memory_profiler
from memory_profiler import profile
@profile
def memory_intensive_function():
# Your code here
pass
# Run: python -m memory_profiler script.py
4. Use timeit for micro-benchmarks:
import timeit
# Compare different approaches
time1 = timeit.timeit('sum([1,2,3,4,5])', number=100000)
time2 = timeit.timeit('sum((1,2,3,4,5))', number=100000)
print(f'List: {time1}, Tuple: {time2}')
Your Answer
You need to be logged in to answer questions.
Log In to Answer