What's the difference between Python's copy.copy() and copy.deepcopy()?

Open
Aug 30, 2025 596 views 2 answers
27

I'm working on a Python application and running into an issue with Python debugging. Here's the problematic code:


# Current implementation
import threading
import time

def worker():
    global counter
    for _ in range(100000):
        counter += 1  # Race condition here

counter = 0
threads = [threading.Thread(target=worker) for _ in range(4)]
for t in threads:
    t.start()

The error message I'm getting is: "KeyError: 'missing_key'"

What I've tried so far:

  • Used pdb debugger to step through the code
  • Added logging statements to trace execution
  • Checked Python documentation and PEPs
  • Tested with different Python versions
  • Reviewed similar issues on GitHub and Stack Overflow

Environment information:

  • Python version: 3.11.0
  • Operating system: Ubuntu 22.04
  • Virtual environment: venv (activated)
  • Relevant packages: django, djangorestframework, celery, redis

Any insights or alternative approaches would be very helpful. Thanks!

L
Asked by lisa_data
Bronze 50 rep

2 Answers

23

The difference between threading and multiprocessing in Python is crucial for performance:

Threading (shared memory, GIL limitation):

import threading
import time

def io_bound_task(name):
    print(f'Starting {name}')
    time.sleep(2)  # Simulates I/O operation
    print(f'Finished {name}')

# Good for I/O-bound tasks
threads = []
for i in range(3):
    t = threading.Thread(target=io_bound_task, args=(f'Task-{i}',))
    threads.append(t)
    t.start()

for t in threads:
    t.join()

Multiprocessing (separate memory, no GIL):

import multiprocessing
import time

def cpu_bound_task(name):
    # CPU-intensive calculation
    result = sum(i * i for i in range(1000000))
    return f'{name}: {result}'

# Good for CPU-bound tasks
if __name__ == '__main__':
    with multiprocessing.Pool(processes=4) as pool:
        tasks = [f'Process-{i}' for i in range(4)]
        results = pool.map(cpu_bound_task, tasks)
        print(results)

Concurrent.futures (unified interface):

from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, ProcessPoolExecutor

# For I/O-bound tasks
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor:
    futures = [executor.submit(io_bound_task, f'Task-{i}') for i in range(4)]
    results = [future.result() for future in futures]

# For CPU-bound tasks
with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor:
    futures = [executor.submit(cpu_bound_task, f'Process-{i}') for i in range(4)]
    results = [future.result() for future in futures]
S
Answered by sarah_tech 1 week, 4 days ago
Newbie 45 rep

Comments

john_doe: Great Python profiling example! The cProfile output helped me identify the bottleneck in my data processing pipeline. 1 week, 4 days ago

10

Here's how to optimize Python code performance using profiling tools:

1. Use cProfile for function-level profiling:

import cProfile
import pstats

# Profile your code
cProfile.run('your_function()', 'profile_output.prof')

# Analyze results
stats = pstats.Stats('profile_output.prof')
stats.sort_stats('cumulative')
stats.print_stats(10)  # Top 10 functions

2. Use line_profiler for line-by-line analysis:

# Install: pip install line_profiler
# Add @profile decorator to functions
@profile
def slow_function():
    # Your code here
    pass

# Run: kernprof -l -v script.py

3. Memory profiling with memory_profiler:

# Install: pip install memory_profiler
from memory_profiler import profile

@profile
def memory_intensive_function():
    # Your code here
    pass

# Run: python -m memory_profiler script.py

4. Use timeit for micro-benchmarks:

import timeit

# Compare different approaches
time1 = timeit.timeit('sum([1,2,3,4,5])', number=100000)
time2 = timeit.timeit('sum((1,2,3,4,5))', number=100000)
print(f'List: {time1}, Tuple: {time2}')
J
Answered by james_ml 1 week, 4 days ago
Bronze 90 rep

Your Answer

You need to be logged in to answer questions.

Log In to Answer